|Chase County among third of state’s counties showing growth|
|Written by Wauneta Breeze|
|Thursday, 28 March 2013 19:05|
By Russ Pankonin
The Imperial Republican
Chase County’s bucking the trend. When more than two-thirds of Nebraska’s counties have lost population since the last census, Chase County has grown.
According to data released by the U.S. Census Bureau earlier this month, Chase County climbed back above the 4,000-mark with 4,064 residents.
The data compares population totals on April 1, 2010 and estimates as of July 1, 2012.
In the 27-month span, Chase County grew from 3,966 to the 4,064 mark, or an increase of 2.5 percent.
Chase County ranks among 30 counties in Nebraska that showed an increase during that same time frame and is among 18 counties whose growth was 1 percent or higher.
Of those 30 counties, 14 are west of Kearney in Buffalo County.
Chase County’s neighbor to the south, Dundy County, showed a 0.6 percent increase in population to 2,021.
Several other counties in western Nebraska showed growth from 0.1 to 0.7 percent growth.
Those counties include Box Butte, Cherry, Logan, Phelps, Sioux and Cheyenne.
Counties west of Buffalo County showing 1 percent or more growth include Chase, Blaine, Thomas, Grant, Arthur, Duell and Banner.
As a state, Nebraska grew 1.6 percent, with much of that growth occurring in the eastern Nebraska areas of Lincoln and Omaha.
Lancaster County (Lincoln) grew by 8,000 residents, Sarpy (Papillion) 7,013, and Douglas County (Omaha) 14,155 people.
1 in 3 U.S. counties decline
A record number of U.S. counties—more than 1 in 3—are showing decreasing population where deaths outnumber births. Factors include an aging population and weakened local economies that are spurring young adults to seek jobs and build families elsewhere.
The census estimates highlight the population shifts as the U.S. encounters its most sluggish growth levels since the Great Depression.
Census data shows 1,135 of the nation’s 3,143 counties are now experiencing “natural decrease,” where deaths exceed births. That’s up from roughly 880 U.S. counties, or 1 in 4, in 2009.
Already apparent in Japan and many European nations, natural decrease is now increasingly evident in large swaths of the U.S.
Among the 20 fastest-growing large metropolitan areas last year, 16 grew faster than in 2011 and most of them are located in previously growing parts of the Sun Belt or Mountain West.
Among the slowest-growing or declining metropolitan areas, most are now doing worse than in 2011 and they are all located in the Northeast and Midwest.
New York ranks tops in new immigrants among large metro areas, but also ranks at the top for young residents moving away.
In contrast, the Texas metropolitan areas of Dallas, Houston and Austin continued to be big draws for young adults, ranking first, second and fourth among large metro areas in domestic migration due to diversified economies that include oil and gas production. Phoenix, Las Vegas and Orlando also saw gains.
By region, growth in the Northeast slowed last year to 0.3 percent, the lowest since 2007; in the Midwest, growth dipped to 0.25 percent, the lowest in at least a decade. In the South and West, growth rates ticked up to 1.1 percent and 1.04 percent, respectively.
(Associated Press reports were also used to compile this story.)